Most oral contracts are legally binding. There are, however, some exceptions, depending on the design of the contract and the subject matter of the contract. In many cases, it is best to establish a written agreement to avoid litigation. What if an oral offer from the seller was accepted the next day in a text message clearly stating that the offer of x dollar is accepted? If this were not offered in writing/ A handshake agreement is legally binding in many jurisdictions. But when a party withdraws, there is a legal mountain to climb to prove that an oral contract has been concluded. Apparently, the ancestral tradition of the handshake comes from a ritual that gave both people the opportunity to make sure the other didn`t hide a weapon. Over the years, this ritual has become many things, one of which remains the conclusion of an oral contract. Many clients have asked me whether such an agreement is valid or, in other words, is it legally binding under Quebec law? It is important to remember that as long as there is an offer and acceptance with clear conditions, there is an agreement. It does not matter whether it is written, signed and testified in a formal legal document, handwritten on the proverbial cocktail towel, displayed in an exchange of emails or text messages or communicated orally. For an oral agreement to be binding, the elements of a contract in force must be present.
To illustrate how the elements of a contract create binding terms in an oral agreement, we use the example of a man who borrows $200 from his aunt to replace a flat tire. This last point can obviously be more difficult to prove; This does not mean that an oral agreement is not legally binding – it simply means that it can be difficult to implement from a convincing point of view. So why do lawyers insist that agreements be drawn up, signed, dated and testified in writing? It is not because these things are necessary to reach a binding agreement. It is intended to ensure that there is no uncertainty as to the existence of an agreement or ambiguity as to the terms of that agreement. «An oral contract is not worth the paper on which it is written.» – Samuel Goldwyn, film producer In general, an oral contract is as valid as a written contact. However, the Civil Code of Québec mentions certain exceptions to this rule (for example.B marriage contracts, mortgages or certain gifts and mandates). A written document is required for these derogations. As such, an oral agreement is valid and legally binding for the majority of treaties.
. . .